Transparency alternatives to MHR People First
Other HR and payroll vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at MHR People First. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 71 that differ from MHR People First on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
MHR People First has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at MHR People First” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at MHR People First | Found at MHR People First, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oysteroysterhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Oyster | 74/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Sloneeksloneek.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sloneek | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| BambooHRbamboohr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BambooHR | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Factorialfactorialhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Factorial | 61/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Deeldeel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deel | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Employment Heroemploymenthero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Employment Hero | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Namelynamely.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Namely | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | nothing | Compare |
| Remoteremote.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Remote | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Peblhellopebl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pebl | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Humaanshumaans.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Humaans | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Multiplierusemultiplier.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Multiplier | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | nothing | Compare |
| Charlie HRcharliehr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Charlie HR | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.