Transparency alternatives to Docusnap
Other IT documentation and asset tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Docusnap. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 37 that differ from Docusnap on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Docusnap has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Docusnap” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Docusnap | Found at Docusnap, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setylsetyl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Setyl | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Ardoqardoq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ardoq | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Toriitoriihq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Torii | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Planviewplanview.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Planview | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Zlurizluri.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zluri | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Paligopaligo.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Paligo | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Electricelectric.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Electric | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Orbusorbussoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Orbus | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Zylozylo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zylo | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| EZOfficeInventoryezo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to EZOfficeInventory | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cledaracledara.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cledara | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Lansweeperlansweeper.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lansweeper | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.