SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Workwize

Other IT documentation and asset tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Workwize does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 33 that differ from Workwize on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Workwize has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Workwize does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Workwize does notWorkwize publishes, and they do not
Zlurizluri.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Orbusorbussoftware.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Setylsetyl.com 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Ardoqardoq.com 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Certifications named Compare
Electricelectric.ai 48/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Lansweeperlansweeper.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Planviewplanview.com 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Toriitoriihq.com 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Zylozylo.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Bizzdesignbizzdesign.com 38/100 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Avolutionavolutionsoftware.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Cledaracledara.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.