Transparency alternatives to Certara
Other Laboratory information systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Certara. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
Need a functional replacement? Run a synthetic sample trial before comparing product fit. This disclosure table cannot establish which modules or workflows another product can replace. Follow the sample workflow checklist.
12 shown of 46 that differ from Certara on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Certara has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Certara” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Certara | Found at Certara, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nethealth Labnethealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nethealth Lab | 52/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Genemodgenemod.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Genemod | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| LIMSeylimsey.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LIMSey | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Benchlingbenchling.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benchling | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Scispotscispot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scispot | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| IGORigorlabapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IGOR | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Quartzyquartzy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Quartzy | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Rspaceresearchspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rspace | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Labsteplabstep.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Labstep | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Dotmaticsdotmatics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dotmatics | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Labgurulabguru.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Labguru | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Magic Touchmagictouchsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Magic Touch | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.