SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Xavo

Other Laboratory information systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Xavo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 44 that differ from Xavo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Xavo has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Xavo does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Xavo does notXavo publishes, and they do not
Nethealth Labnethealth.com 52/100 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
LIMSeylimsey.com 48/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Benchlingbenchling.com 43/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
IGORigorlabapp.com 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Data location stated Compare
Quartzyquartzy.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare
Rspaceresearchspace.com 35/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Genemodgenemod.net 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Data location stated Compare
Scispotscispot.com 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Data location stated Compare
Magic Touchmagictouchsoftware.com 26/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Labsteplabstep.com 17/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Citrine Informaticscitrine.io 9/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Opus Lsysmex.de 9/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.