Transparency alternatives to LabCup
Other Laboratory information systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at LabCup. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
Need a functional replacement? Run a synthetic sample trial before comparing product fit. This disclosure table cannot establish which modules or workflows another product can replace. Follow the sample workflow checklist.
12 shown of 41 that differ from LabCup on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
LabCup has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at LabCup” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at LabCup | Found at LabCup, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nethealth Labnethealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nethealth Lab | 52/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Genemodgenemod.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Genemod | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| LIMSeylimsey.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LIMSey | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Benchlingbenchling.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benchling | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Scispotscispot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scispot | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| IGORigorlabapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IGOR | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Rspaceresearchspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rspace | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Labsteplabstep.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Labstep | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Quartzyquartzy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Quartzy | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Magic Touchmagictouchsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Magic Touch | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Dotmaticsdotmatics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dotmatics | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Labgurulabguru.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Labguru | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.