Transparency alternatives to Scopi
Other Project management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Scopi. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 72 that differ from Scopi on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Scopi has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Scopi” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Scopi | Found at Scopi, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airtableairtable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Airtable | 91/100 | 10 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +7 | nothing | Compare |
| Smartsheetsmartsheet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smartsheet | 91/100 | 10 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +7 | nothing | Compare |
| monday.commonday.comSee also Transparency alternatives to monday.com | 74/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Linearlinear.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Linear | 70/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Miromiro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Miro | 70/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Oraora.pmSee also Transparency alternatives to Ora | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Plutioplutio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Plutio | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Breezebreeze.pmSee also Transparency alternatives to Breeze | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Teamworkteamwork.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamwork | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| BigTimebigtime.netSee also Transparency alternatives to BigTime | 52/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Stackfieldstackfield.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Stackfield | 52/100 | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Niftyniftypm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nifty | 43/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.