SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Wakeo

Other Shipping and logistics vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Wakeo. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 80 that differ from Wakeo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Wakeo has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Wakeo” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at WakeoFound at Wakeo, not found there
AfterShipaftership.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AfterShip 83/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 nothing Compare
Sendcloudsendcloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sendcloud 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Metapackmetapack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Metapack 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Elromcoelromco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elromco 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Locuslocus.shSee also Transparency alternatives to Locus 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
FourKitesfourkites.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FourKites 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Cargosoncargoson.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cargoson 35/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Bringgbringg.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bringg 43/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
EasyPosteasypost.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EasyPost 43/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Easyshipeasyship.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easyship 43/100 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing nothing Compare
ShipStationshipstation.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ShipStation 43/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Quivoquivo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Quivo 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.