Transparency alternatives to pirAMide business manager
Other CRM vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at pirAMide business manager. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 108 that differ from pirAMide business manager on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
pirAMide business manager has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at pirAMide business manager” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at pirAMide business manager | Found at pirAMide business manager, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarifyclarify.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Clarify | 70/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Insightlyinsightly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Insightly | 61/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Nutshellnutshell.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nutshell | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Teamleaderteamleader.euSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamleader | 59/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| HubSpothubspot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HubSpot | 52/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| EspoCRMespocrm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EspoCRM | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| EngageBayengagebay.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EngageBay | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Capsulecapsulecrm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Capsule | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Twentytwenty.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Twenty | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Freshworks (Freshsales)freshworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Freshworks (Freshsales) | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| SuiteDashsuitedash.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SuiteDash | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Coppercopper.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Copper | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.