Transparency alternatives to Fresh Milk Software
Other Field service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Fresh Milk Software. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 47 that differ from Fresh Milk Software on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Fresh Milk Software has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Fresh Milk Software” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Fresh Milk Software | Found at Fresh Milk Software, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ServiceM8servicem8.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ServiceM8 | 48/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Praxedopraxedo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Praxedo | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| ServiceTitanservicetitan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ServiceTitan | 30/100 | 5 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Fulcrumfulcrumapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fulcrum | 42/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| FieldEdgefieldedge.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FieldEdge | 36/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Jobbergetjobber.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jobber | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Payacapayaca.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Payaca | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Uptickuptickhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Uptick | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Arezarez.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Arez | 26/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| ServicePowerservicepower.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ServicePower | 26/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Housecall Prohousecallpro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Housecall Pro | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Bella FSMbellafsm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bella FSM | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.