Transparency alternatives to Vonigo
Other Field service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Vonigo. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 47 that differ from Vonigo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Vonigo has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Vonigo” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Vonigo | Found at Vonigo, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ServiceM8servicem8.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ServiceM8 | 48/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Praxedopraxedo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Praxedo | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| ServiceTitanservicetitan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ServiceTitan | 30/100 | 5 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Fulcrumfulcrumapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fulcrum | 42/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| FieldEdgefieldedge.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FieldEdge | 36/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Jobbergetjobber.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jobber | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Payacapayaca.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Payaca | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Uptickuptickhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Uptick | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Arezarez.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Arez | 26/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| ServicePowerservicepower.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ServicePower | 26/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Bella FSMbellafsm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bella FSM | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | nothing | Compare |
| Fieldcodefieldcode.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fieldcode | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.