Transparency alternatives to PeopleForce
Other HR and payroll vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at PeopleForce. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 71 that differ from PeopleForce on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
PeopleForce has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at PeopleForce” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at PeopleForce | Found at PeopleForce, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oysteroysterhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Oyster | 74/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| BambooHRbamboohr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BambooHR | 70/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Sloneeksloneek.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sloneek | 65/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Factorialfactorialhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Factorial | 61/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Deeldeel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deel | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Employment Heroemploymenthero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Employment Hero | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| EmployeeConnectemployeeconnect.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EmployeeConnect | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Humaanshumaans.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Humaans | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Namelynamely.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Namely | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | nothing | Compare |
| Multiplierusemultiplier.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Multiplier | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Charlie HRcharliehr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Charlie HR | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Lanolano.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Lano | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.