SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to SiteHelpDesk

Other IT service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at SiteHelpDesk. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from SiteHelpDesk on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

SiteHelpDesk has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at SiteHelpDesk” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at SiteHelpDeskFound at SiteHelpDesk, not found there
Atlassianatlassian.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Atlassian 71/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +5 nothing Compare
Rezolverezolve.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Rezolve 52/100 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Atomicworkatomicwork.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Atomicwork 48/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Xurrentxurrent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Xurrent 41/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Alloy Softwarealloysoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Alloy Software 39/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Ivantiivanti.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ivanti 39/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
ManageEnginemanageengine.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ManageEngine 35/100 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
OTRSotrs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OTRS 35/100 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
GLPIglpi-project.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to GLPI 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
HaloITSMhaloitsm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HaloITSM 35/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Siitsiit.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Siit 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
TOPdesktopdesk.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TOPdesk 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.