Transparency alternatives to GoInformatics
Other Laboratory information systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at GoInformatics. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 37 that differ from GoInformatics on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
GoInformatics has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at GoInformatics” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at GoInformatics | Found at GoInformatics, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nethealth Labnethealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nethealth Lab | 52/100 | 7 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| LIMSeylimsey.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LIMSey | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Benchlingbenchling.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benchling | 43/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| IGORigorlabapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IGOR | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Rspaceresearchspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rspace | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Quartzyquartzy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Quartzy | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Genemodgenemod.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Genemod | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Scispotscispot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scispot | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Dotmaticsdotmatics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dotmatics | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Magic Touchmagictouchsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Magic Touch | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| SciSurescisure.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SciSure | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Dornerdorner.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Dorner | 22/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.