Transparency alternatives to iPR Software
Other Marketing automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at iPR Software. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from iPR Software on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
iPR Software has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at iPR Software” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at iPR Software | Found at iPR Software, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loopsloops.soSee also Transparency alternatives to Loops | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Keapkeap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Keap | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| GetResponsegetresponse.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GetResponse | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Customerlycustomerly.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Customerly | 57/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Insider Oneinsiderone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Insider One | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Mappmapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mapp | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Bloomreachbloomreach.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bloomreach | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Postscriptpostscript.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Postscript | 56/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Airshipairship.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Airship | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Verogetvero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vero | 43/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CleverTapclevertap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CleverTap | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Upp.aiupp.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Upp.ai | 43/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.