Transparency alternatives to webwalker
Other Sales engagement vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at webwalker. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 50 that differ from webwalker on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
webwalker has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at webwalker” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at webwalker | Found at webwalker, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lushalusha.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lusha | 74/100 | 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +6 | nothing | Compare |
| Clearbitclearbit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clearbit | 65/100 | 8 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Showpadshowpad.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Showpad | 65/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Hunterhunter.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Hunter | 70/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Mixmaxmixmax.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mixmax | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Scratchpadscratchpad.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scratchpad | 61/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Apolloapollo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Apollo | 57/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| ZoomInfozoominfo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ZoomInfo | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Snov.iosnov.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Snov.io | 62/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Fathomfathom.videoSee also Transparency alternatives to Fathom | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Instantlyinstantly.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Instantly | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| PhantomBusterphantombuster.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PhantomBuster | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.