Transparency alternatives to Officenet
Other HR and payroll vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Officenet. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 52 that differ from Officenet on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Officenet has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Officenet” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Officenet | Found at Officenet, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oysteroysterhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Oyster | 74/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| BambooHRbamboohr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BambooHR | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Factorialfactorialhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Factorial | 61/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Deeldeel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deel | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Employment Heroemploymenthero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Employment Hero | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Namelynamely.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Namely | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Charlie HRcharliehr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Charlie HR | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Lanolano.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Lano | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Peblhellopebl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pebl | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Remoteremote.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Remote | 35/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| EmployeeConnectemployeeconnect.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EmployeeConnect | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | nothing | Compare |
| Multiplierusemultiplier.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Multiplier | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.