SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Diabolocom

Other Contact centre vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Diabolocom does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 22 that differ from Diabolocom on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Diabolocom has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Diabolocom does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Diabolocom does notDiabolocom publishes, and they do not
Aircallaircall.io 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
CloudTalkcloudtalk.io 61/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 1 Status page with history Compare
JustCalljustcall.io 43/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Nextivanextiva.com 43/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Genesysgenesys.com 26/100 1 Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Squaretalksquaretalk.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Odigoodigo.com 17/100 1 Data location stated 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Babelforcebabelforce.com 13/100 1 Data location stated 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Enreachenreach.com 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Five9five9.com 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
NICEnice.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Sipgatesipgate.de 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.