SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to CallMiner

Other Contact centre vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at CallMiner. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 45 that differ from CallMiner on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

CallMiner has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at CallMiner” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at CallMinerFound at CallMiner, not found there
Aircallaircall.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Aircall 70/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Call Handling VCCcallhandling.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Call Handling VCC 57/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
2Chat2chat.coSee also Transparency alternatives to 2Chat 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
CloudTalkcloudtalk.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to CloudTalk 61/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
CallHippocallhippo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CallHippo 59/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Talkdesktalkdesk.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Talkdesk 48/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Certifications named Compare
Puzzelpuzzel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Puzzel 47/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Certifications named Compare
RingCentralringcentral.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RingCentral 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
NICEnice.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NICE 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
JustCalljustcall.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to JustCall 43/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Nextivanextiva.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nextiva 43/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 1 Certifications named Compare
Diabolocomdiabolocom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Diabolocom 30/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.