Alternatives to RingCentral
Other Contact centre vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that RingCentral does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from RingCentral on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
RingCentral has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and RingCentral does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and RingCentral does not | RingCentral publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talkdesktalkdesk.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Aircallaircall.io | 61/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| CloudTalkcloudtalk.io | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Nextivanextiva.com | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Puzzelpuzzel.com | 47/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| JustCalljustcall.io | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Diabolocomdiabolocom.com | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Squaretalksquaretalk.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Odigoodigo.com | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Swyxswyx.com | 17/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Placetelplacetel.de | 14/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Sipgatesipgate.de | 13/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.