Transparency alternatives to FreeClimb
Other Contact centre vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that FreeClimb does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 44 that differ from FreeClimb on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
FreeClimb has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and FreeClimb does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and FreeClimb does not | FreeClimb publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aircallaircall.io | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| CloudTalkcloudtalk.io | 61/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| CallHippocallhippo.com | 59/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| 2Chat2chat.co | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| RingCentralringcentral.com | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| NICEnice.com | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Puzzelpuzzel.com | 47/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Call Handling VCCcallhandling.co.uk | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| JustCalljustcall.io | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CallMinercallminer.com | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| United World Telecomunitedworldtelecom.com | 24/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| CallNcalln.com | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.