Transparency alternatives to Swyx
Other Contact centre vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Swyx. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 45 that differ from Swyx on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Swyx has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Swyx” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Swyx | Found at Swyx, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aircallaircall.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Aircall | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| CloudTalkcloudtalk.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to CloudTalk | 61/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| CallHippocallhippo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CallHippo | 59/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Call Handling VCCcallhandling.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Call Handling VCC | 57/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| 2Chat2chat.coSee also Transparency alternatives to 2Chat | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| JustCalljustcall.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to JustCall | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| RingCentralringcentral.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RingCentral | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| NICEnice.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NICE | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Talkdesktalkdesk.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Talkdesk | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Puzzelpuzzel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Puzzel | 47/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Nextivanextiva.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nextiva | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| CallNcalln.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CallN | 22/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.