Transparency alternatives to United World Telecom
Other Contact centre vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that United World Telecom does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 44 that differ from United World Telecom on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
United World Telecom has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and United World Telecom does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and United World Telecom does not | United World Telecom publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CloudTalkcloudtalk.io | 61/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Aircallaircall.io | 61/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Call Handling VCCcallhandling.co.uk | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| JustCalljustcall.io | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Nextivanextiva.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| FreeClimbfreeclimb.com | 35/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Talkdesktalkdesk.com | 26/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| CallHippocallhippo.com | 59/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| NICEnice.com | 39/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| CallMinercallminer.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Diabolocomdiabolocom.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Genesysgenesys.com | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.