Transparency alternatives to Rysis Chronodesk
Other Helpdesk vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Rysis Chronodesk. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 47 that differ from Rysis Chronodesk on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Rysis Chronodesk has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Rysis Chronodesk” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Rysis Chronodesk | Found at Rysis Chronodesk, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BoldDeskbolddesk.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BoldDesk | 78/100 | 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +6 | nothing | Compare |
| Deskprodeskpro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deskpro | 83/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Intercomintercom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intercom | 70/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Desk365desk365.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Desk365 | 74/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Gorgiasgorgias.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gorgias | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Dixadixa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dixa | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Frontfront.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Front | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Kustomerkustomer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kustomer | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Hiverhiverhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hiver | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Kayakokayako.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kayako | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Tidiotidio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tidio | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Zendeskzendesk.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zendesk | 35/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.